Matthew Wade
is confident he can do the No.6 position justice in the Sydney Test
after the captain Michael Clarke declared Wade would likely move up in
the absence of Shane Watson. Usman Khawaja is on standby for Clarke, who
is still carrying a hamstring niggle, but is not expected to replace
the injured Watson, with the allrounder Glenn Maxwell more likely to
take Watson's place.
Clarke said after the Melbourne Test that if Maxwell played he would
most probably bat at No.7, with Wade to shift up to six and Clarke and
the retiring Michael Hussey also moving up the list to Nos.4 and 5
respectively. That means extra responsibility for Wade, who has scored a
hundred and two half-centuries during his eight-Test career, but he
said his experience in the top six for Victoria would hold him in good
stead.
"I'd be comfortable moving up to No.6 if that's what the team needed me
to do to win a Test match," Wade said in Sydney on Monday. "I've been
lucky enough to bat at six for Victoria for a couple of years now. In
terms of impact on keeping, it doesn't make too much of a difference
coming one up the order. I'm happy to bat at six if the team needs me,
or stay at seven."
Traditionally, No.7 has been the position occupied by Australian
wicketkeepers. Even the great Adam Gilchrist only batted at No.6 on 14
occasions in his Test career, while Wade's predecessor Brad Haddin
filled the role seven times. Gilchrist had success in the No.6 spot,
scoring 645 Test runs at 49.61 including two centuries, but Haddin
managed only 126 runs at an average of 18.
But more often than not, Gilchrist had the luxury of coming in with
plenty of runs already on the board. Australia's average four-down total
when Gilchrist came to the crease as a Test No.6 was 223; for Haddin,
the average was 110. Given the lack of experience in Australia's batting
line-up, Wade shouldn't be surprised if he walks out with relatively
few runs on the board, but he does not believe he will be under any
extra pressure.
"My personal expectation if I'm at six or seven is to contribute runs to
the team," Wade said. "Personally that doesn't change for me. Maybe
outside expectation is that the No.6 needs to get a little bit more
runs, but I'm trying to get runs every time I bat.
"I'll bat exactly the same. If I get the opportunity to bat at six, I'm
guessing Pup will talk to me a couple of days out and he'll just want me
to bat the same but in the No.6 position. I wouldn't be changing my
game plan at all."
Wade, 25, has proven himself a consistent scorer at first-class level
during a career spanning six seasons. After 92 first-class innings, Wade
has scored 3055 runs at 40.19, very similar figures to those of
Gilchrist at the same stage of his career. After 92 first-class innings,
Gilchrist had made 3080 runs at 41.06, while Haddin had 2971 runs at
35.79.
Whether a move up the order could become permanent after Hussey's
retirement remains to be seen, but if Watson chooses to give up bowling
such a change would allow Australia to pick an extra bowling allrounder
for each Test. Regardless of where he bats, Wade's role in the coming
months is likely to include greater leadership, for the absence of
Hussey and Ricky Ponting has left the Australian line-up lacking
experience.
Over the past year, Wade has become a permanent presence in the
Australian line-up in all three formats and only David Warner, who
hasn't missed a match, has represented Australia more times in the past
12 months than Wade, who has played 46 of a possible 49 games. In that
time, the only matches he didn't play were during last summer's Test
series against India, when Haddin remained the first-choice gloveman.
Wade's heavy workload could mean he is asked by the selectors to rest
during the upcoming ODIs or Twenty20 internationals against Sri Lanka or
West Indies, especially with a big year coming up, including a
four-Test tour of India and two Ashes series. Wade said he was not keen
to take a break but would do so if the selectors insisted.
"I don't want to stop playing cricket for Australia, not at all," Wade
said. "But I don't think that will be my decision, that will be a
decision that will be made higher up, if I am going to rest any games. I
want to play every game that I can for Australia, but I fully
understand where the people are coming from above.
"Going forward with how much cricket we are playing, the rest of the
fast bowlers and if I end up having a rest, it will be beneficial down
the track. But at the time, no cricketer wants to rest. I'm not
expecting it, but if it comes along I've got to be open to that
discussion."
0 comments:
Post a Comment